Swift Certain Fair Resource Center

  • Programs
  • SCF Evaluations
  • Newsroom
  • About
Home
|
Newsroom
|
Winnable criminal-justice reforms in 2022
Posted on November 7, 2022 by Kelly Smith

Winnable criminal-justice reforms in 2022

Eliminate re-incarceration and the use of jail sanctions for technical violations of probation or parole rules
Problem: Technical violations are behaviors that break parole rules that would not count as “crimes” for someone not under community supervision, such as missing curfew or a check-in meeting, maintaining employment, avoiding association with people who have conviction histories, and failing a drug test. In 20 states, more people are admitted to prison for technical violations than for new crimes. Incarcerating people for “technical violations” of probation and parole conditions—whether in jail for a so-called “quick dip” or “flash incarceration” or in prison—is a common but harmful and disproportionate response to minor rule violations. These unnecessary incarcerations make it harder for people under supervision to succeed and lead to higher correction costs.
Solutions: States should limit incarceration as a response to supervision violations to only when the violation has resulted in a new criminal conviction and poses a direct threat to public safety. If incarceration is used to respond to technical violations, the length of time served should be limited and proportionate to the harm caused by the non-criminal rule violation.
Legislation: New York S 1144A (2021) restricts incarceration for technical violations of parole; Massachusetts H 1798/S 1600 (2021) would reduce reincarceration for technical violations or parole; and Michigan S 1050 (2020) restricts the amount of time a person can be incarcerated for technical violations of probation.
More information: The Council of State Governments’ report Confined and Costly, csgjusticecenter.org/‌publications/‌confined-costly, shows how many people are admitted and incarcerated for technical violations in your state’s prisons. See also the Pew Charitable Trusts’ report To Safely Cut Incarceration, States Rethink Responses to Supervision Violations, pewtrusts.org/‌-/‌media/‌assets/‌2019/‌07/‌pspp_states_target_technical_violations_v1.pdf.

Posted in Newsroom
High on Baltimore’s wish list: Better Maryland DPSCS supervision of parolees
The influential HOPE probation program is badly misnamed

SIGN UP FOR UPDATES

Keep up with the latest from the Swift Certain Fair Resource Center. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Find us

Swift Certain Fair Resource Center New York University 370 Jay Street, 12th Floor Brooklyn, NY 11201 Telephone: (646) 308-0508

E-mail: info@scfcenter.org

New York University Marron Institute of Urban Management
Web Site Notice of Federal Funding and Disclaimer:
This Web site is funded in whole or in part through a grant from the Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Neither the U.S. Department of Justice nor any of its components operate, control, are responsible for, or necessarily endorse, this Web site (including, without limitation, its content, technical infrastructure, and policies, and any services or tools provided). SCFCenter.org - Copyright © 2023. All rights reserved.