Swift Certain Fair Resource Center

  • Programs
  • SCF Evaluations
  • Newsroom
  • About
Home
|
Newsroom
|
Which Prisoner Reentry Programs Work? Replicating and Extending Analyses of Three RCTs
Posted on November 26, 2019 by Kelly Smith

Which Prisoner Reentry Programs Work? Replicating and Extending Analyses of Three RCTs

twitter.com/‌jenniferdoleac/‌status/‌1181551102292107264

We replicate and extend three studies: one on a swift, certain, fair (SCF) program of graduated sanctions for drug-involved probationers; one on aftercare programs for recently released, drug-involved offenders; and one on a comprehensive reentry program for inmates in Minnesota. We find suggestive evidence that the SCF program reduced recidivism, but estimates are too imprecise to draw clear conclusions. Our reanalysis suggests that endogeneity bias in the original study affected the magnitude and sign of some coefficients, but not statistical significance (although this is because the study is substantially underpowered).
***
Doleac (2019a) reviews the literature on desistance from crime, including existing empirical evidence on the effects of various programs and policies on prisoner reentry outcomes. The above analyses contribute new evidence to relatively thin literatures in three areas: SCF programs, aftercare programs for those with substance-use disorders, and wrap-around services. A number of recent RCTs have attempted to replicate the initial success of the HOPE program in Hawaii. DYT was part of this batch of RCTs, and the authors of that evaluation concluded that DYT had no impact on participants. Combined with null effects from other RCTs of similar programs, this contributed to a sense that HOPE (and SCF more broadly) did not replicate in other contexts. Our results above suggest that this punchline may be misleading. The DYT experiment cannot rule out large beneficial effects of the program on participants, and in fact the point estimates suggest meaningful benefits.

Posted in Newsroom
Responding to Substance-Use-Related Probation and Parole Violations: Are Enhanced Treatment Sanctions Preferable to Jail Sanctions?
Assessing the Use and Impact of Points and Rewards across Four Federal Probation Districts: A Contingency Management Approach

SIGN UP FOR UPDATES

Keep up with the latest from the Swift Certain Fair Resource Center. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Find us

Swift Certain Fair Resource Center New York University 370 Jay Street, 12th Floor Brooklyn, NY 11201 Telephone: (646) 308-0508

E-mail: info@scfcenter.org

New York University Marron Institute of Urban Management
Web Site Notice of Federal Funding and Disclaimer:
This Web site is funded in whole or in part through a grant from the Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Neither the U.S. Department of Justice nor any of its components operate, control, are responsible for, or necessarily endorse, this Web site (including, without limitation, its content, technical infrastructure, and policies, and any services or tools provided). SCFCenter.org - Copyright © 2023. All rights reserved.