Swift Certain Fair Resource Center

  • Programs
  • SCF Evaluations
  • Newsroom
  • About
Home
|
Newsroom
|
The Effect of Prosecutorial Actions on Deterrence: A County-Level Analysis
Posted on May 31, 2019 by Kelly Smith

The Effect of Prosecutorial Actions on Deterrence: A County-Level Analysis

Despite little research examining the effect of celerity of punishment on deterrence, there is evidence that shows celerity does play a role. An assessment of the Hawaii Opportunity Probation With Enforcement (HOPE) program (Hawken & Kleiman, 2009) shows probationers who violate probation and are subject to immediate and certain penalties are significantly less likely to be arrested, have fewer positive drug tests, and have fewer missed probation appointments, when compared with probationers who have uncertain and delayed penalties for violating probation. More evidence was found in a quasi-experimental test of a program similar to the HOPE program implemented in Washington State (Hamilton et al., 2016). Like Hawken and Kleiman (2009), the authors found the use of swift and sure punishments for probationers helped deter probation violations. Furthermore, the authors show that probationers subjected to quicker, more certain punishments had lower rates of recidivism and committed fewer crimes, compared with those probationers in the control group who were not subjected to swift and sure punishments.
…
Reconciling the mixed findings in the above studies is difficult. A possible cause of the mixed findings relates to the fact that all the above studies involved specialized courts. Specialized courts (e.g., Drug Court, DUI Court, ECR Court) primarily focus on therapeutic and preventive interventions rather than punitive punishment (Hannah-Moffat & Maurutto, 2012). As such, there may be an interaction occurring between increased celerity but decreased severity. Furthermore, as with the Hamilton et al. (2016) and Hawken and Kleiman (2009) studies, the specialized court studies are examining the specific deterrent effect on offenders rather than the general deterrent effect on a population. Again, we are interested in evaluating the effect prosecutors have on general deterrence.

Posted in Newsroom
Wyoming legislature tackles criminal justice reform package
Missed Officer–Probationer Contacts and Its Influence on Rearrest

SIGN UP FOR UPDATES

Keep up with the latest from the Swift Certain Fair Resource Center. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Find us

Swift Certain Fair Resource Center New York University 370 Jay Street, 12th Floor Brooklyn, NY 11201 Telephone: (646) 308-0508

E-mail: info@scfcenter.org

New York University Marron Institute of Urban Management
Web Site Notice of Federal Funding and Disclaimer:
This Web site is funded in whole or in part through a grant from the Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Neither the U.S. Department of Justice nor any of its components operate, control, are responsible for, or necessarily endorse, this Web site (including, without limitation, its content, technical infrastructure, and policies, and any services or tools provided). SCFCenter.org - Copyright © 2023. All rights reserved.