Swift Certain Fair Resource Center

  • Programs
  • SCF Evaluations
  • Newsroom
  • About
Home
|
Newsroom
|
Does the Involvement of Family and Friends Improve Probation and Parole Outcomes? A Quantitative Evaluation of Triple-S: Social Supports in Supervision
Posted on May 25, 2022 by Kelly Smith

Does the Involvement of Family and Friends Improve Probation and Parole Outcomes? A Quantitative Evaluation of Triple-S: Social Supports in Supervision

In traditional community corrections frameworks, agencies utilise the tactic of “fortress supervision”, whereby the officers are located in offices and the offenders must report to these locations (Pew Center on the States, 2008). Sadly, this setup fails to help officers understand the criminogenic circumstances that offenders are vulnerable to (Schaefer, Cullen, & Manchak, 2017). Officers are likely very unfamiliar with how offenders spend their time: where they go, what they do, and who they spend time with. A brief case management meeting is simply insufficient to understand the offender’s life. Additionally, fortress supervision limits the influence that officers can have on their clients, as there is surely a very small deterrent effect for those individuals who recognise that their supervisor is not routinely supervising their behaviour (Cullen, Eck, & Lowenkamp, 2002). Although the officer has some authority to monitor the offender (e.g., drug tests, electronic monitoring, collateral checks), the vast majority of an offender’s actions go unsupervised by community corrections agents. As such, it is in the best interest of probation and parole officers to consider how they can serve as a more constant presence in offenders’ lives, whereby outcomes of choices (positive or negative) are swift and certain (Executive Session on Community Corrections, 2017); this is how psychological conditioning occurs. The goal is for community-supervised offenders to regularly think of their order (far more than the 15 minutes or so that they may spend in their designated community corrections office), including the benefits of compliance and the consequences of misbehaviours. Ideally, community corrections agencies want to extend the invisible arm of control that they have over offenders’ lives beyond the confines of the office itself (Cullen et al., 2002; Schaefer et al., 2017; Western & Schiraldi, 2017).

Posted in Newsroom
Sorting Through the Evidence: A Step Toward Prioritization of Evidence-Based Community Supervision Practices
Reimagining Probation Reform: Applying a Coaching Model to Probation Departments

SIGN UP FOR UPDATES

Keep up with the latest from the Swift Certain Fair Resource Center. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Find us

Swift Certain Fair Resource Center New York University 370 Jay Street, 12th Floor Brooklyn, NY 11201 Telephone: (646) 308-0508

E-mail: info@scfcenter.org

New York University Marron Institute of Urban Management
Web Site Notice of Federal Funding and Disclaimer:
This Web site is funded in whole or in part through a grant from the Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Neither the U.S. Department of Justice nor any of its components operate, control, are responsible for, or necessarily endorse, this Web site (including, without limitation, its content, technical infrastructure, and policies, and any services or tools provided). SCFCenter.org - Copyright © 2023. All rights reserved.