Swift Certain Fair Resource Center

  • Programs
  • SCF Evaluations
  • Newsroom
  • About
Home
|
Newsroom
|
Responding to Substance-Use-Related Probation and Parole Violations: Are Enhanced Treatment Sanctions Preferable to Jail Sanctions?
Posted on November 26, 2019 by Kelly Smith

Responding to Substance-Use-Related Probation and Parole Violations: Are Enhanced Treatment Sanctions Preferable to Jail Sanctions?

More recently, the use of sanctions—and particularly jail sanctions—has become more commonly used in applied community corrections. Much of the increase in the use of jail as a sanctioning means is attributable to the emergence of the swift, certain, and fair (SCF) sanctioning approach. The SCF sanctioning model, which is patterned after the well-known HOPE program in Hawaii, is a deterrent-based strategy that emphasizes the imposition of immediate and certain sanctions, normally in the form of short jail sentences, as a means to dissuade substance abuse behaviors in probation and parole caseloads (Kleiman, Kilmer, & Fisher, 2014). Due to the frequency of substance-use-related violations in everyday community- based corrections, this study’s focus on jail sanctions should be able to speak to the SCF’s common approach of swift and certain jail-based sanctioning.
Research on the use of graduated sanctions has shown success across a variety of outcomes, including increased offender compliance and reduced revocation rates (Grommon, Cox, Davidson, & Bynum, 2013; Hamilton, Campbell, van Wormer, Kigerl, & Posey, 2016; Hawken & Kleiman, 2009; Kilmer, Nicosia, Heaton, & Midgette, 2013; Steiner, Makarios, Travis, & Meade, 2012; Wodahl, Garland, Culhane, & McCarty, 2011). Hawken and Kleiman (2009) often cited evaluation of the Hawaii HOPE program, for example, found that sanctions administered under the SCF framework were associated with fewer missed appointments, fewer failed drug tests, and lower recidivism rates. Two recent studies, however, raise doubts about the effectiveness of sanctions in community supervision. Lattimore et al. (2016) evaluation of SCF sanctioning programs at four sites found that sanctions were largely ineffective and in some cases produced iatrogenic effects, including increased likelihood of revocation and recidivism. Similar findings were reported in O’Connell and associates’ evaluation of an SCF sanction program in Delaware (O’Connell, Brent, & Visher, 2016). These recent studies have led some to question regarding whether SCF sanctioning programs can really be considered an evidence-based practice (Cullen, Pratt, & Turanovic, 2016).
Despite this finding and adjoining policy recommendation, it is important to keep in mind that results similar to these would need to be replicated prior to changing criminal justice procedures. Further emphasizing this point, we are unable to specifically investigate the casual mechanism driving this non-significant main effect for jail sanction (a point to which we return in the discussion of this study’s limitations).

Posted in Newsroom
Criminal Thinking as a Moderator of the Perceived Certainty-Offending Relationship: Age Variations
Which Prisoner Reentry Programs Work? Replicating and Extending Analyses of Three RCTs

SIGN UP FOR UPDATES

Keep up with the latest from the Swift Certain Fair Resource Center. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Find us

Swift Certain Fair Resource Center New York University 60 Fifth Avenue, 2nd Floor New York, NY 10011 Telephone: (646) 308-0508

E-mail: info@scfcenter.org

New York University Marron Institute of Urban Management
Web Site Notice of Federal Funding and Disclaimer:
This Web site is funded in whole or in part through a grant from the Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Neither the U.S. Department of Justice nor any of its components operate, control, are responsible for, or necessarily endorse, this Web site (including, without limitation, its content, technical infrastructure, and policies, and any services or tools provided). SCFCenter.org - Copyright © 2021. All rights reserved.