Swift Certain Fair Resource Center

  • Programs
  • SCF Evaluations
  • Newsroom
  • About
Home
|
Newsroom
|
Assessing Campus Alcohol Policies: Measuring Accessibility, Clarity, and Effectiveness
Posted on November 26, 2019 by Kelly Smith

Assessing Campus Alcohol Policies: Measuring Accessibility, Clarity, and Effectiveness

Sanctions classified as most effective were those that panelists agreed would have a strong, population‐wide deterrent effect as stand‐alone measures. These included student organization probation and loss of student organization status, which panelists agreed were potent deterrents due to their permanent, structural effects on the physical and normative drinking environments on campus. Sanctions categorized as somewhat effective included those that would have some effect as a stand‐alone sanction, but whose effectiveness would be heightened as part of a “package” of graduated sanctions or stepped‐care procedures working in tandem to deter policy violations, and appropriately intervene with individuals found in violation, respectively. These included individual suspension and probation, which, because of their severity and the extended deliberative process often required to enforce them, become less swift and certain, and consequently less effective, at the population level as stand‐alone measures. Additionally, panelists determined that alcohol evaluation/screening would be most effective as a part of a stepped‐care model with a clear referral in the policy language to an evidence‐based program for the students in need. While this consequence does not necessarily have a population‐level impact, it could prove crucial for students benefiting from brief interventions and referral to treatment.
***
Furthermore, to be most effective, sanctions should be clearly tied to specific policy violations. Deterrence is critical to effective enforcement and rests on the perception that violations will incur swift, certain, and sufficiently severe sanctions (Decker and Kohfield, 1990; Grogger, 1991; Ross, 1984). Certainty has been shown to be the most relevant and effective factor in deterring behaviors that warrant sanctions, especially among college students (Nagin and Pogarsky, 2001; Tittle, 1969). Assessment of certainty was deemed beyond the scope of this research; however, recommendations about increasing certainty, often in the form of tying specific sanctions to violation of specific policies, were included in the final recommendations to the schools.

Posted in Newsroom
Commentary on Bainbridge (2019): Improving the Evidence Base for 24/7 Sobriety
A Presidential Roadmap to Ending Mass Incarceration: Invest in People, not Prisons

SIGN UP FOR UPDATES

Keep up with the latest from the Swift Certain Fair Resource Center. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Find us

Swift Certain Fair Resource Center New York University 370 Jay Street, 12th Floor Brooklyn, NY 11201 Telephone: (646) 308-0508

E-mail: info@scfcenter.org

New York University Marron Institute of Urban Management
Web Site Notice of Federal Funding and Disclaimer:
This Web site is funded in whole or in part through a grant from the Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Neither the U.S. Department of Justice nor any of its components operate, control, are responsible for, or necessarily endorse, this Web site (including, without limitation, its content, technical infrastructure, and policies, and any services or tools provided). SCFCenter.org - Copyright © 2023. All rights reserved.