SCF is cited as an approach that ensures fairness—and, therefore, legitimacy—in the legal system.
Evaluations of several SCF implementations have yielded inconsistent results.
Randomized studies are demonstrating the effectiveness of SCF compared to supervision-as-usual.
While evidence suggests that SCF can reduce recidivism, more testing is needed. Additionally, it can be difficult to replicate and scale existing SCF initiatives, as programs are adjusted and implemented to meet local needs.
Byrne JAG is facing budget cuts, which may reduce the ability of local agencies to test evidence-based practices, including SCF and reentry programs.